 |
Dark Forums
This forum has moved to freeism.org/forum
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
 Posted: Post subject: Some historic religious sayings concerning women |
 |
|
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.feminism/browse_thread/thread/a0d3ffa36a154c50/9603b780ee2d66c0?hl=en#9603b780ee2d66c0
Well, religions aren't all wrong. Where they come to women, they get a lot of things right.
Females have been evil for millions of years. Female evilness isn't just a thing that happened since they decided to steal a man's posessions during divorce after the 1960s. No, i'ts been there forever.
Do you think that religions didn't notice that females are evil?
| Quote: | | "(a woman is) a pitcher full of filth with its mouth full of blood, yet all run after her. |
Well, yeah.
| Quote: | | "Our teachers have said: Four qualities are evident in women: They are greedy at their food, eager to gossip, lazy and jealous." |
Yep! Although today, women are greedy for other material posessions, like shoes, or diamond rings, or cars, or houses, etc. Food isn't it for them anymore.
| Quote: | | "For your deceit, the very son of God had to perish!" |
Yep! Females have been getting males into death and suffering for millions of years. Ever since female first decided "if you don't give me all your posessions, life and soul, I won't give you any children"
| Quote: | | "Woman is a temple built over a sewer, the gateway to the devil. Women are the gate to hell. |
Yep! Females make themselves out to be such beautiful pretty charming innocent things, when in fact they are pure evil nasty destructive selfish monsters. Their fakeness is unbelievable.
| Quote: | | "Woman was the instrument which Satan employed to possess men's souls." |
Yep! It is women who have made males aggressive and warfaring. Simply because females like suffering, they get a sadistic kick out of making males fight for her.
| Quote: | | "To find a virtuous women is like finding the one eel in a bag with 500 venomous snakes. And if you grope in the bag and find the eel you have but a wet and slimy eel by the tail." |
Sad, but true.
| Quote: | | "Adam was deceived by Eve, and not Eve by Adam, and therefore it is just, that woman receive and acknowledge him for governor whom she called to sin, lest that again she slide and fall by womanly facility." Hexaemeron |
True. Females are great liars, fakes, and manipulators.
| Quote: | | "...necessary evil, a natural temptation, a domestic peril, a deadly fascination, and a painted ill." |
Thankfully they won't be necessary for long! Not with technology to allow reproduction without females! 
| Quote: | | "I don't see what sort of help woman was created to provide man with, if one excludes the purpose of procreation. If woman was not given to man for help in bearing children, for what help could she be? To till the earth together? If help were needed for that, man would have been a better help for man. The same goes for comfort in solitude. How much more pleasure is it for life and conversation when two friends live together than when a man and a woman cohabitate?" De genesi ad litteram, 9, 5-9 |
Yep. Females can't do anything useful. All the good things in the world are made by males. All the technology, art, music, everything!
| Quote: | | "It was hotly debated whether women were human beings or animals. Many Christians at the time thought that women had no souls and were deemed less holy than men. The Christian view of females persisted in the orthodox mediaeval definitions of a woman as a pestilential beast," "destroyer of men," "bar to salvation," etc. The full text runs to about fifteen lines of Latin invective. The notion was carried by 32 to 31 votes. Women were voted human by only one vote of the majority! " |
Well, females don't have good souls. They have souls, but there is not a single ounce of goodness in them. Only pure relentless evil. My life has proved this to me, even when I at first believed females are good.
| Quote: | | A husband is able to judge a wife, correcting her ... But not beating her ... but he is able to chastise with moderation since she is of his family ... as lord his servant ... and likewise his hired hand. |
Unfortunately, this is for the best. Why? Because females are evil. Today's lies has it that females are innocent no matter what happens. However, science (when you can find it amoungst the lies) has proven that females are evi in domestic relationships. I have seen a study that showed that in 85% of relationships, the female will start the arguments. So, if males are bastards, that makes females maybe 6x more bastardly, which makes them pure evil.
Anyhow, so because females are evil, it is NOT good for them to let their opinions go uncorrected. It is better for the husband's opinions to stand. Unfortunate, but there you go.
| Quote: | | A woman taught one time and the whole world was overthrown. |
Hehe. Yeah. Now we can enjoy rapes, murder and crime, less riches and more corruption, because females have ruined society by throwing fathers out of houses, thus causing crime, and thus sucking up the wealth of males.
| Quote: | | "Woman is less qualified [than man] for moral behavior. For the woman contains more liquid than the man, and it is a property of liquid to take things up easily and to hold onto them poorly. Liquids are easily moved, hence women are inconstant and curious. When a woman has relations with a man, she would like, as much as possible, to be lying with another man at the same time. Woman knows nothing of fidelity. Believe me, if you give her your trust, you will be disappointed. Trust an experienced teacher. For this reason prudent men share their plans and actions least of all with their wives. Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in comparison with his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she herself cannot get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And so, to put it briefly, one must be on one's guard with every woman, as if she were a poisonous snake and the horned devil.... In evil and perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward all good." Quaestiones super de animalibus XV q. 11 |
So true! Females are totally dishonest, and without honour.
| Quote: | | "The female sex cannot represent Christ because women are incomplete human beings." S.Th. III Supp. 39, 1 |
They lack the Y chromosome, which contains BRAIN DEVELOPMENT GENES. Even giving a female testosterone won't help her underdeveloped brain. She is forever without the instructions of life which can bring genius to a man's brain.
| Quote: | | Objection 2. Further, subjection and limitation were a result of sin, for to the woman was it said after sin (Gn. 3:16): "Thou shalt be under the man's power"; and Gregory says that, "Where there is no sin, there is no inequality." But woman is naturally of less strength and dignity than man; "for the agent is always more honorable than the patient," as Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. xii, 16). Therefore woman should not have been made in the first production of things before sin. |
The voice of reason! Females should only be treated worse, because females are evil. Not because they are female. You see, people a long time ago really had a sense of fairness.
| Quote: | | A woman was the effective cause of damnation since she was the origin of lying and Adam was deceived through her, and therefore she was not able to be the effective cause of salvation since Orders effects grace in another and thus salvation. |
All my ex gfs were great liars. And I was only ever honest with them. So sad that I got played for a fool. But I was young, and now I've learnt the hard way, I've wized up to their evils.
| Quote: | | But why are women removed from civil and public offices? The reason is because they are fragile and usually less discerning. And further, The reason for the difference (between the roles of men and women) is on account of the fragility, imbecility and less natural constancy and discernment of women. |
Hmmm, this is a good reason. Females suck at thinking. They generally make everything worse.
| Quote: | | "When I was a child there were many witches, and they bewitched both cattle and men, especially children." |
I think he meant "many bitches"?
| Quote: | | "I should have no compassion on these witches; I should burn them all." |
Change that to "bitches", and that's *exactly* how I feel!
| Quote: | | "Even though they grow weary and wear themselves out with child-bearing, it does not matter; let them go on bearing children till they die, that is what they are there for." Works 20.84 |
Well, they should until we got enough children. The excess females (6 out of 7) should be sent off to war, to kill each other, to satisfy the righteous need for revenge on evil females, so that they know what it is like to suffer instead of it just being us that suffers.
| Quote: | | "I will multiply thy pains," |
Seems like he didn't do it enough. I hope to multiply thy pains by a few thousand times!
| Quote: | | "To promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any realm, nation, or city, is repugnant to nature; an insult to God, a thing most contrary to his revealed will and approved ordinance; and finally, it is the subversion of good order, of all equity and justice. |
And see just how Margaret Thatcher ruined England. Cleopatra also caused the downfall of the Egyptian empire!
| Quote: | | But lest that we shall seem to be of this opinion alone, let us hear what others have seen and decreed in this matter. In the [Roman] Rules of the Law thus is it written: "Women are removed from all civil and public office, so that they neither may be judges, neither may they occupy the place of the magistrate, neither yet may they be speakers for others." . . . The Law further will not permit that the woman give anything to her husband, because it is against the nature of her kind, being the inferior member, to presume to give anything to her head. The Law does moreover pronounce womankind to be most avaricious (which is a vice intolerable in those that should rule or minister justice). And Aristotle, as before is touched, does plainly affirm, that wheresoever women bear dominion, there the people must needs be disordered, living and abounding in all intemperance, given to pride, excess, and vanity; and finally, in the end, they must needs come to confusion and ruin. |
Single mother households full of daughters who are nothing but cheap egotistical hos, and sons who are heading to a life in jail???? Seems like they understood well back then!
That John Knox really was right on!
...
You know something? This really gets me thinking. Females have ALWAYS BEEN EVIL, OK so I knew that already.
But a long time ago, when males also knew that females are evil, males would act as "THE BIGGER PERSON".
They didn't actually harm them. They treated them as inferior beings, who were gently treated. Just being the bigger person basically. Despite that females were evil and deserved to be destroyed, they simply instead put them in a position in society better suited for their evil nature, and weak bodies. And also cared for them and looked after them, despite that they didn't deserve this.
And see what thanks males get for that. After thousands of years of being the bigger person, we get called patriarchs.
Despite that there's NEVER been a patriarchy. Just a "BiggerPersonry". But today we have a matriarchy, that is corroding the world.
Funny isn't it? How the criminals accuse the victims of the crime. Why? Because the criminals THINK of the crime all the time. Females have always wanted an evil matriarchy, like they have today. Where they can be nasty evil whores, who get glorified for being female, getting themselves pregnant with the nastiest most devil-like guy she can find (ignoring all the nice guys), and then blame the worlds problems on males for not doing even more to protect and provide for her. All the while doing her best to ruin the lives of males by stealing their lives posessions and souls.
Thats the matriarchy. Thats the evilness that is written into the soul of females. The matriarchy that females constantly obsess over.
And so despite that males are metaphorically "the bigger person", females will accuse us of the first thing that comes to their mind. "You are a matriar.... oh I mean a patriarch". After all, they think about this crime all the time, so its the first thing they'll think of to accuse us of.
Projection is common amoungst criminals and evil people.
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?"
Last edited by sexytechmage on ; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
| Posted: Post subject: Re: Some historic religious sayings concerning women |
|
|
Thats why I never be the "bigger person" anymore... not if I can avoid it.
It's too easy to forget that person you've forgiven, and manipulated into a si tuation where they can't harm you, IS STILL JUST AS EVIL.
And in a later date, he/she will just harm you again, except even worse.
Screw being the bigger person. This time I'm out to make my enemies pay.
In the West, males have been "The bigger person" for thousands of years, and have forgotten just how evil females are. Males gave females a chance at equality, a chance to not be living under the conditions of "The bigger person" but as an "equal person".
And see how females have totally screwed it up the instant they got a chance at it.
I think we've probably all been through this once before. Not you and I, but other males and other females, in the past.
There was probably a time in our past, a corrupt violent warfaring time which makes religiosly dominated times look like pure heaven.
A time when learning, thinking, fairness and caring was outlawed by a sisterhood. A time when writing wasn't even invented, because females are too stupid to create writing, and too evil to allow males to feel confident in their intelligence or allow them any success in life.
A time when females were ruling a matriarchy, simply because they control reproduction. And of course this making the females weak and stupid, and ensuring their own defeat out of their own crime. (Ironic eh)
And religions or other learned advanced men (like Aristotle or Plato) civilissed the matriarchies, bringing civilisation to a socieity, and informing everyone of female's evil. And eventually just ending up in the situation of being "the bigger person".
And here we are at it again. The females are still just as evil as before, and put another matriarchy in place.
Only THIS time will be the last. We are too advanced this time around. Our science has advanced too far, to make Aristotle and Plato look like your "average smart guy". We've had Darwins and Faradays to make our world a better place.
That, and the fact that *I* am here, and I will make sure that the truth about females being evil parasites, gets out there, into the mainstream.
And then females will understand why they are weak and stupid, consciously, instead of understanding it only subconsciously in their feelings.
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snorri
Veteran
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 1777
|
| Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
That's exactly how I feel...
Men in the past did understand much more about female evilness (remember that these writings are made by philosophers and sages though, not by regular people), even in the 19th century the smarter ones understood it. Because it's bleedingly obvious ! But now they don't understand it anymore, they just worship them. However, they didn't worship them in the past, and there are still some cultures where males don't worship females, or even mistreat them on a regular basis. This means that perhaps modern males could be fixed. But I really don't know any way to do this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
| Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
Snorri...
it's quite possible that many smart guys know all of this, and just aren't saying it.
Thats how guys act, unfortunately, they'll do anything to be sucessful, even if it means just keeping silent on issues that they feel are important.
I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of scientists and thinkers of our times already know that females are evil, but just aren't saying anything.
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockett
Rookie
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Post subject: Prejudice |
|
|
| Those quotes speak more of their authors' prejudice than their truth. The only biological difference between men and women is their reproductive organs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
daveycomet
Girl Hater
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 81
Location: Southern England, UK
|
| Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
| snorri wrote: |
Men in the past did understand much more about female evilness (remember that these writings are made by philosophers and sages though, not by regular people), even in the 19th century the smarter ones understood it. |
men in the past were much more free to speak out about female evilness. imagine if george bush said women were evil (hardly suggesting he's one of the smarter ones).
STM, i've no idea how much you know about recent political history in britain, but it's by no means held universally that Margaret Thatcher ruined england. I'm not exactly a fan, myself, but as she became prime minister england was in a lot of trouble, with unions striking left, right and centre. There are those that consider that her actions in breaking the unions were the best thing that could have happened.
I'm just writing this to warn you that there's a very outspoken anti-thatcherite voice in britain, although if you've read a relatively unbiased account then of course you're as entitled to your opinion as most brits...
| Quote: | | They lack the Y chromosome, which contains BRAIN DEVELOPMENT GENES. Even giving a female testosterone won't help her underdeveloped brain. She is forever without the instructions of life which can bring genius to a man's brain. |
I would dearly like to know where you found this. To my knowledge, it is utter nonsense. The Y chromosome is a comparitively small chromosome. It's about 1/6th the size of the X chromosome. It's major gene is the testes determining factor. As far as i have read, and in school i read relatively extensively about the actions of the Y chromosome, it contains no major or critical genes relating to neurones or the brain.
Finally, at a time when scientific research occurs at a rate that is impressive when compared to any other time in history, i really don't like the suggestion that learning is outlawed.
Although i am prepared to concede that in some areas of academia a matriarchy is allowed to dictate terms, but scientific evidence of differences between the sexes isn't sanitised or censored. i know this because i have read many scientific journals and research papers (not usually in full, lol) that have intimated differences between the sexes that don't fit in with feminism.
While the matriarchy may have social sciences balls in it's fist or whatever, proper science doesn't pull it's punches, and making up scientific facts will not win any arguments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
| Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
| daveycomet wrote: | | It's about 1/6th the size of the X chromosome. It's major gene is the testes determining factor. |
1/6th of the size of the X chromosome is still greater than zero. It's still enoguh to do plenty of stuff. Why can't it contain brain development genes? Just because you haven't come across any studies on it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
http://www.google.com/search?q=y+chromosome+brain+genes
See, a simple search brings up results. I have a feeling for these sort of things. I think I should know 
I'd expect a thorough and indepth review of all the papers on genetics ever published, should bring up a lot more. No idea how you'd do that, but it's certain that the y-chromosome has beneficial properties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome Interesting, it says the Y gene contains the lowest number of known diseases. That's pretty much what I'd expect. Much like mDNA it's had to evolve strategies to become more reliable.
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
| Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | The discovery of genetic palindromes in the DNA of human males may have unlocked the secrets of the Y chromosome while raising ethical questions about male infertility, gene therapy, and differences between the sexes.
Scientists have long known that sex-determining genes on the Y chromosome set it apart from the other twenty-two chromosomes; while human males have both an X and a Y chromosome, females have two Xs. Other than sex determination, the Y was thought to be a degenerate form of the X, containing unimportant genetic information. But as reported in a recent issue of Nature, researchers at the MIT-affiliated Whitehead Institute have discovered this so-called "junk DNA" may actually preserve the most important genes of the male chromosome.
In females, one X chromosome checks itself against the other to ensure the genetic code is correct, initiating a "code repair" if discrepancies are found. "That's the way our genes get shuffled from one generation to another and a damaged version of a gene can get moved out," said Whitehead Institute researcher Steven Rozen.
But because they can only inherit a Y from the father, males lack paired sex chromosomes. And because of their size difference, only part of the X chromosome can be used as a template to fix mistakes in the Y. This presents a problem in weeding potentially lethal mistakes out of its genetic code.
But it appears the Y chromosome has developed a unique strategy to avert catastrophe. Long sequences of genetic palindromes surround important sperm-production genes and allow the Y to match up its own arms instead of needing an additional chromosome to check for mistakes. The palindromes are 99.97 percent similar, acting as the Y's own template to crosscheck genetic information. "So they stay identical over millions of years," said Helen Skaletsky, who directed the sequencing of the Y chromosome at Whitehead. "And it means that whenever mutations appear, they are rewritten by the other sequence and the arms stay almost identical."
All of which raises the possibility that this overwriting of genetic information may result in the copying of bad gene onto good, creating problems in male fertility. "Many sperm-production genes occur in these mirror pairs," Rozen said. But in keeping with Darwinian theory, the Y seems to consistently get it right.
"If you know that you've got Y chromosomes that are sub-fertile because they're missing key genes, quite frankly, from a nature perspective, those are Y chromosomes that we don't want to have around," said Huntington Willard, a scientist at the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy at Duke University. "That's what Darwinian evolution is."
But in this technologically advanced culture, problems of male infertility can be remedied through extreme gene therapy measures. Knowing the exact sequence of the Y chromosome and being able to more accurately pinpoint damaged copies of sperm-production genes may indeed, as Willard suggested, "bring to the forefront... questions about people's genetic rights and whether in fact one does have a God-given right to procreate."
New information from the Y chromosome may also raise what Willard called the "specter of the genome in males and genomes in females being substantially different." In addition to sperm-production genes, scientists also identified a brain-specific protein on the Y chromosome. "Does that suggest that this 'brain function' is different characteristically in males than in females? As a scientist, from a biological perspective, it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that the male brain might be a little different," Willard said. "But I might have a different response as the father of a daughter or a member of society."
|
http://www.science-spirit.org/archive_cm_detail.php?new_id=474
Not bad also. It's funny, but I imagined pretty much something the same as that, a few years ago before I read of it today. And I believed it then, before I'd seen any stupid studies. And I believe it just as much now. It would make sense for a single chromosome to have multiple genes and for them to repair each other. Just because feminists are fucking stupid and want to say "no you can't do that because that would remove your inferior status and we want you to be inferior", doesn't mean that it doesn't work and hasn't worked for billions of years.
You see, it really is illogical to believe that any technique available for improving the stability and function of the Y gene, would not be taken up.
Feminists might love to make up fucked up delusional lies that are based on lack of knowledge and some desire to feel superior and the ability to throw away common sense.... but those of us who understand common sense cannot see how a male design can be unhealthy or weak. It can only be stronger in every way, or at the same.
And guess what? I do the searching, and the results confirm my beliefs. Why do the results confirm my beliefs so regularly? Because I have a feel for reality, that is why.
Even if you weren't to be stupid (not you Dave, I just mean the hypothetical person who says that Y is unstable), you cannot say that the Y gene is unstable, because then you must also say that the mDNA is unstable, thus making all life unstable from backteria to plants to women to mice animals insects and everything! Sheer stupidity.
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?"
Last edited by sexytechmage on ; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sexytechmage
Your host
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1969
|
| Posted: Post subject: Re: Some historic religious sayings concerning women |
|
|
It is by luxury and the vanity of women that empires decay. -- Benjamin Franklin
_________________
"How many space machines did you fall out of?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
